THE UKRAINIAN CRISIS AND THE QUESTION OF SOVEREIGNTY AND TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY

Nevena Jovanović

Abstract

The current armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine is a consequence of their decade’s long complex and complicated relations, which was influenced by the United States and the countries of Western Europe. The organization of the referendum and signing of the decree on the annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol to the Russian Federation, and the conflicts in the Donbass that lasted until 2018 significantly damaged the political relations of these two countries, which were part of the Soviet Union until 1991, when they acquired their independence. The escalation of continuously bad relations led to an armed conflict, but also to the most significant political, economic and military crisis, and the consequences which were felt by the entire world.

The topic of this research is the Ukrainian crisis with reference to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine after the referendums and the joining of four regions (Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporozhye and Kherson) to the Russian Federation. The article aims to indicate and emphasize that the key international actors who (in)directly participate in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine have different approaches when it comes to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, that is, when it comes to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Serbia, forgetting on respecting the principle of sovereign equality of states. In other words, since the outbreak of the armed conflict in Ukraine in February 2022, we have witnessed that member states of the international community, guided by their own national interests, can take different positions regarding the sovereignty and territorial integrity of a particular state, as a result of differently formulated policies.

References

Gajić, Aleksandar i Nikola Rajić. 2022. „Geopolitički okvir ruske intervencije u Ukrajini.” Politika nacionalne bezbednosti 22 (1): 127–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.22182/pnb.2212022.6.

Dimitrijević, Duško, Ivona Lađevac i Mihajlo Vučić. 2012. „Preduzete aktivnosti u UN oko rešavanja pitanja Kosova i Metohije.” Međunarodni problemi 64 (4): 442–478. doi: https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1204442D

Dimitrijević, Duško. 2020. „Secesija država u doktrini i praksi međunarodnog prava.” U Secesija sa stanovišta unutrašnjeg i međunarodnog prava i njene političke posledice, ur. Zoran Knežević, Kosta Čavoški i Vladimir Kostić, 53–82. Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti.

Marković, Ratko. 2016. Ustavno pravo. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.

Milutinović, Milovan, Zoran Kalinić i Slobodan Radulj. 2014. „Secesija izraz prava naroda na samoopredeljenje.” Svarog 9: 20–48. doi:10.7251/SVR1409020M

Nastić, Maja. 2017. „Neposredno učešće građana u postupku promene ustava.” U Reviziona vlast u Srbiji- proceduralni aspekti ustavnih promena, ur. Edin Šarčević i Darko Simović, 91–113. Sarajevo: Fondacija Centar za javno pravo.

Nikolić, Oliver. 2013. „Referendum (sa posebnim osvrtom na Švajcarsku i Hrvatsku).” Strani pravni život 57 (1): 13–26.

Petrović, Dragan. 2015. „Ukrajinska kriza 2013-2015.” Kultura polisa 12 (26): 219–236.

Petrović, Dragan i Rajko Bukvić. 2019. Ukrajinska kriza 2013-2019. Beograd: Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu.

Stanar, Dragan. 2022. „Strateška odgovornost oružanih snaga pri donošenju političke odluke o vojnoj neutralnosti.” Vojno delo 74 (4): 40–51. doi: 10.5937/vojdelo2204040S

Stanar, Dragan. 2021. Etika međunarodne politike. Beograd: Dobrotoljublje.

Stanojević, Ivan. 2014. „Bezbednosna dilema u Ukrajini – drugo čitanje Berija Posena.” Politeia 4 (8): 57–67. doi: 10.7251/POL1408057S

Tomić, Miloš. 2022. „Ugrožavanje nacionalne bezbednosti secesijom teritorija sa raspoloživim prirodnim resursima: slučaj Srbije, Ukrajine i Španije.” Doktorska disertacija. Univerzitet u Beogradu: Fakultet bezbednosti.

 The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, 2022. „Foreign Ministry’s statement on the referendums in the DPR, LPR, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions.” 28 September 2023. https://mid.ru/es/foreign_policy/news/1831658/?lang=en.

Hurst, Hanum. 2011. „The Advisory Opinion on Kosovo: An Opportunity Lost, or a Poisoned Chalice Refused?” Leiden Journal of International Law 24 (1): 155–161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S092215651000066X

Kuzio, Taras and Paul D’Anier. 2018. The Sources of Russia’s Great Power Politics: Ukraine and the Challenge to the European Order. England: E-International Relations Publishing.

Mills, Claire and Patrick Butchard. 2022. „Implications of the Russian-backed referendums in Ukraine.” House of Commons Library, Research Briefing, Nо. 9631.

Miloglav, Hrvoje i Pasko Tomaš. 2017. „Protivpravnost intervencije i aneksije u međunarodnom pravu: slučaj Krima.” Paragraf 1 (1): 159–190.

Stanar, Dragan. 2020. “Paramilitary Organizations and Private Military Companies in War: How to Restrain What You Do Not Control.” In Jus Post Bellum: Restraint, Stabilization and Peace, ed. Patrick Mileham, 362–387. Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff.

The Kremlin. 2022. “Signing of documents recognising Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics.” 15 August 2023. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/copy/67829.

United Nations General Assembly [UNGA], RES/ES-11/4 (2022), Resolution ES-11/4 (2022) Adopted by the General Assembly at its 11th emergency special sess, on 12 October 2022.

Декларация о независимости Автономной Республики Крым и г.Севастополя 2014, 11. March 2014, https://web.archive.org/web/20140313100800/http://www.rada.crimea.ua/news/11_03_2014_1, last accessed 15 August 2023.

Сергей Смирнов. 2014. „Донецкая народная республика провозгласила себя суверенным государством.” Ведомости, 12. мая 2014. https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2014/05/12/dnr-provozglasila-sebya-suverennym-gosudarstvom, last accessed 15 August 2023.

Указ Президента Российской Федерации о признанин Херсонской области, 29. сентября 2022.

Указ Президента Российской Федерации о признанин Запорожской области, 29. сентября 2022.