COMMUNITY SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH WITH BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS AND IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW: THE IDEA AND REALIZATION OF A DAY CARE CENTER

Miona Gajić

Jasna Hrnčić

Marija Vučinić Jovanović

Abstract

The daycare service for children with behavioral problems is one of the services in social care that are based on an ecosystem approach and user participation, and that develop cooperation between all actors and systems in the community and pluralism of services. Ten years ago, there were several active day care centers for children and youth with behavioral problems (in Novi Sad, Kragujevac, Knjazevac, Pozarevac) that had clearly articulated work programs, while according to data for 2022, there are only two licensed ones in the Republic of Serbia provider of this daycare service (in Bor and Kragujevac). A survey was conducted among daycare service providers in both licensed daycare centers. Based on the respondents’ answers, we can conclude that the daycare service has multiple positive effects on both users and their families, as well as on the local community. The existence of this type of service contributes to respecting the basic principles of social protection, respecting the recommendations of international instruments and implementing the provisions of domestic legislation. Day care provides opportunities to apply such methods aimed at supporting and empowering young people, gaining insight into the problem, correcting behavior and increasing personal responsibility. A special advantage is the formation of a more intensive relationship between the professional worker and the user as well as his family. Time commitment and a wide range of activities that can be realized in immediate work, but also in the community together with the user, give positive results. The results of the research indicate the importance of children and young people with behavioral problems remaining in the natural environment, that is, their families and communities with the aim of preventing institutionalization. The results of questionnaires and interviews with service providers, on the other hand, point to the need for further improvement of this service in the context of developing mechanisms for the sustainability of its quality and efficiency. Funding, availability and cross–sector networking continue to be a challenge in the implementation and functioning of day care. As one of the results of the research, the importance of adequate training of experts, the need for external supervision and the fight against prejudices that are common in smaller local communities emerges. The lack of this type of service as well as other incidental services of a preventive nature in the community increases the risk of continued antisocial behavior of this group of children and youth, stigmatization and institutionalization.

References

Axelsson, Erik. 2010. “Young offenders and juvenile justice in Sweden.” UK Parlament. Last access May 27 2023 https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN05278/SN05278.pdf.

Brkić, Miroslav. 2016. Licenciranje usluga socijalne zaštite. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka i Ministarstvo za rad, zapošljavanje, boračka i socijalna pitanja.

Burgund, Anita. 2016. „Uticaj ličnih i sredinskih faktora na mlade u procesu pripreme za napuštanje alternativnog staranja.ˮ Doktorska disertacija. Univerzitet u Beogradu: Fakultet političkih nauka.

Cuellar, Alison, McReynolds, Larkin, and Gail Wasserman. 2006. “A Cure for crime: Can mental health treatment diversion reduce crime among youth?ˮ Jоurnal of Policy Analysis and Management 25 (1): 202–204. doi: 10.1002/pam.20162.

Drake, Elizabeth, Aos, Steve, and Marna Miller. 2009. “Evidence– Based Public Policy Options to Reduce Crime and Criminal Justice Costs: Implications in Washington State.ˮ Victims and Offenders 4 (4): 170–196. doi: 1080/15564880802612615.

Early, Kristin, Ryon, Stephanie, Hand, Gregory, and Julia Blankenship. 2004. “Experimental Community–Based Interventions for Delinquent Youth: An Evaluation of Recidivism and Cost Effectiveness.ˮ Contemporary Issues in Juvenile Justice 8 (1) 1: 32–36.

Ferrer–Wreder, Laura. 2014. “Advancing Child and Adolescent Well–Being Through Positive Youth Development and Prevention Programs.” In Handbook of Child Well–Being, Eds. Asher Ben–Arieh, Ferran Casas, Ivar Frønes and Jill E. Korbin, 3025–3041. Berlin: Springer Dordrecht.

Franklin, Anita, and Patricia Sloper. 2006. Participation of disabled children and young people in decision–making relating to social care. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, Heslington.

Government of New South Wales [NSW Government]. n.d. “Youth Justice Community Offices.” NSW Government. Last access May 27 2023. https://www.service.nsw.gov.au/nswgovdirectory/youth–justice–community–offices.

Government of United Kingdom [GOV.UK]. n.d. “Youth offending teams.ˮ GOV.UK. Last access May 27 2023. https://lawexplores.com/juvenile–crime–and–the–justice–system–in–sweden//.

Hollander, Anna, and Michael Tärnfalk. 2017. “Juvenile Crime and the Justice System in Sweden.ˮ Law Explorer. Last access May 27 2023. https://lawexplores.com/juvenile–crime–and–the–justice–system–in–sweden//.

Hrnčić, Jasna, Tamara Džamonja Ignjatović, i Vera Despotović Stanarević. 2010. Deca i mladi sa problemima ponašanja. Usluge i tretmani u zajednici. Beograd: Republički zavod za socijalnu zaštitu.

Hrnčić, Jasna. 2009. Prestupništvo mladih: rizici, tokovi, ishodi. Beograd: Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja.

Jugović, Aleksandar, Vesna Žunić Pavlović, i Miroslav Brkić. 2009. „Socijalna zaštita maloletnih delikvenata u tranzicijskom društvu Srbije.ˮ Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, IV deo Socijalna politika i socijalni rad: 647–663.

Lakićević, Mira. 2011. „Socijalne reforme i socijalni razvoj Srbije.ˮ U Socijalne reforme–sadržaj i rezultati, ur. Drenka Vuković i Mihail Arandarenko, 107–127. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka.

Luebbers, Stefan, Anne Sophie Pichler, Rachael Fullam, and James Ogloff. 2019. Embedded Youth Outreach Program Evaluation, Final Report. Melbourne: Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science.

Matković Gordana, i Milica Stranjaković. 2020. Mapiranje usluga socijalne zaštite i materijalne podrške u nadležnosti jedinica lokalnih samouprava u Republici Srbiji. Beograd: Tim za socijalno uključivanje i smanjenje siromaštva Vlade Republike Srbije.

Mihajlović Babić, Suzana, i Marina Pantelić. 2019. „Socijalne reforme u postkomunističkim državama–tri decenije tranzicije socijalnog modela u Republici Srbiji.ˮ Srpska politička misao 64 (2): 325–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.22182/spm.6422019.14.

Ministarstvo za rad, zapošljavanje, boračka i socijalna pitanja. 2022. „Spisak licenci–dnevni boravak za decu i mlade sa problemima u ponašanju.ˮ Ministarstvo za rad, zapošljavanje, boračka i socijalna pitanja. Pristupljeno: 19. oktobar 2022. https://www.minrzs.gov.rs/sr/registri/sektor-za-brigu-o-porodici-i-socialnu-zastitu.

Perišić, Natalija. 2011. „Promena aktera socijalne sigurnosti.ˮ Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka 5/2011: 473–491.

Pravilnik o bližim uslovima i standardima za pružanje usluga socijalne zaštite, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbijeˮ, br. 73/2019.

Republički zavod za socijalnu zaštitu. 2022. Deca u sistemu socijalne zaštite 2021. Beograd: Republički zavod za socijalnu zaštitu.

Republički zavod za statistiku. 2022. Maloletni učinioci krivičnih dela u Republici Srbiji, 2021. Prijave, optuženja i osude. Beograd: Republički zavod za statistiku.

Smith, Emilie, Angela, Wolf, Dan, Cantillon, Thomas, Oseela, and William Davidson. 2004. “The Adolescent Diversion Project.” Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 27 (2): 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1300/J005v27n02_03.

Strategija deinstitucionalizacije i razvoja usluga socijalne zaštite u zajednici za period 2022–2026. godine. „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbijeˮ, br. 30/18.

Šarac, Nada, Lidija, Milanović, Svetlana, Živanić,  i Živorad Gajić. 2010. „Dnevni boravak kao odgovor na potrebe sistema.ˮ U Deca i mladi sa problemima ponašanja: usluge i tretmani u zajednici, ur. Jasna Hrnčić, Tamara Džamonja Ignjatović i Vera Despotović Stanarević, 157–172. Beograd: Republički zavod za socijalnu zaštitu.

Tierney P., Joseph, Jean B. Grossman, and Nancy L. Resch. 1995. Making a Difference– An Impact Study of Big Brothers Big Sisters. Philadelphia: A Publication of Public/Private Ventures.

United Nation General Assembly [UNGA], 45/110, United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non–custodial Measures (“The Tokyo Rulesˮ) adopted by resolution of 14 December 1990.

United Nations General Assembly [UNGA], 40/33, Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (“The Beijing Rulesˮ) adopted by resolution of 29 November 1985.

United Nations General Assembly [UNGA], 44/25, Convention on the Rights of the Child adopted by resolution of 20 November 1989.

Victoria State Government [VIC Government]. n.d. “Youth Justice Community Support Service.” VIC Government. Last access May 27 https://www.justice.vic.gov.au/justice–system/youth–justice/youth–justice–community–support–service.

Zakon o maloletnim učiniocima krivičnih dela i krivičnopravnoj zaštiti maloletnih lica [ZOMUKD], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbijeˮ, br. 85/2005.

Zakon o socijalnoj zaštiti [ZSZ], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbijeˮ, br. 24/2011.