PARLIAMENTARY AND ELECTION BOYCOTTS IN HYBRID REGIMES: EVIDENCE FROM SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE

Vujo Ilić

Abstract

Why do some opposition parties in hybrid regimes escalate their strategies of contention from parliamentary to election boycotts, while others do not? Opposition parties in hybrid regimes engage with a repertoire of extra-institutional strategies, including protests, parliamentary, and election boycotts. These strategies challenge the authoritarian dimension of the regime and aim to level the electoral playing field, but the election boycotts strategy carries more risk than the others, as it can marginalize the opposition. I argue that the opposition parties in hybrid regimes are less likely to take part in elections when the expected incumbent’s electoral advantage is high, and when lower-risk extra-institutional strategies such as protests, and parliamentary boycotts are exhausted or not viable. The article presents evidence from Serbia, including data collected through interviews with the members of parliament and opinion polls, tracing the process that led the opposition parties to escalate the 2019 parliamentary boycott towards the 2020 boycott of the elections, despite being aware of the likely adverse effects. I also conduct a comparative analysis of opposition parties in similar contexts of North Macedonia, Montenegro, and Albania that boycotted the parliament but always took part in the elections. The article brings together the detached literature on parliamentary and electoral boycotts and contributes to a better understanding of opposition strategies in hybrid regimes.

References

• Aleksov, D., Aleksoska, R., Dimitrioski, Z., Daniloska-Jurukoska, L. & Jurukoska, A. 2019. Case Study, Republic of North Macedonia. In Parliamentary Boycotts in the Western Balkans, ed. E. Atanasovski, pp. 88-107. Westminster Foundation for Democracy.
• Alizada, N., Cole, R., Gastaldi, L., Grahn, S., Hellmeier, S., Kolvani, P., Lachapelle, J., Lührmann, A., Maerz, S. F., Pillai, S. & Lindberg, S. I. 2021. Autocratization Turns Viral. Democracy Report 2021. University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute.
• Beaulieu, E. 2006. Protesting the contest: Election boycotts around the world, 1990–2002. San Diego: University of California.
• Beaulieu, E. 2014. Electoral protest and democracy in the developing world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Bermeo, N. 2016. On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy 27 (1), 5-19.
• Bieber, F. 2018. Patterns of competitive authoritarianism in the Western Balkans. East European Politics 34 (3), 337-354.
• Brancati, D. 2016. Democracy protests. Origins, Features, and Significance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Burke, A. E. 2019. Thinking outside the box: Extra-parliamentary strategies and their effects on the development of good governance in new democracies. Doctoral dissertation, Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
• Bursać, D. & Vučićević, D. 2021. Election boycott in a hybrid regime: The case of 2020 parliamentary elections in Serbia. New Perspectives 29 (2), 187-196.
• Buttorff, G. & Dion, D. 2017. Participation and boycott in authoritarian elections. Journal of Theoretical Politics 29 (1), 97-123.
• Carothers, T. 2002. The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy 13 (1), 5-21.
• Crta. 2019a. Lokalni izbori 2018. Finalni izveštaj Crta posmatračke misije. Beograd: Crta.
• Crta. 2019b. Javno mnjenje o učešću građana u demokratskim procesima Srbije 2019. Beograd: Crta.
• Diamond, L. 2015. Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy 26 (1). 141-155.
• European Commission [EC], SWD(2019) 219 final, Serbia 2019 Report, 29.5.2019.
• European Commission [EC], SWD(2020) 352 final, Serbia 2020 Report, 6.10.2020.
• European Commission. 2021. Reports. Last accessed 01. 05. 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/
• Freedom House. 2022. Nations in Transit. Last accessed 01. 05. 2022.  https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit
• George, A. L. & Bennett, A. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Gerring, J. 2004. What is a case study and what is it good for? American political science review 98(2), 341-354.
• Goati, V. 2013. Izbori u Srbiji i Crnoj Gori od 1990. do 2013. i u SRJ od 1992. do 2003. Beograd: Centar za slobodne izbore i demokratiju.
• Hauser, M. 2019. Electoral strategies under authoritarianism: Evidence from the former Soviet Union. London: Lexington Books.
• Helms, L. 2021. The nature of political opposition in contemporary electoral democracies and autocracies. European Political Science 20, 569–557.
• Ilić, V., Branković, T. & Tepavac, T. 2019. Case Study, Serbia. In Parliamentary Boycotts in the Western Balkans, ed. E. Atanasovski, pp. 108-128. Westminster Foundation for Democracy.
• Kelley, J. 2011. Do international election monitors increase or decrease opposition boycotts? Comparative Political Studies, 44(11), 1527-1556.
• Kovačević, M. 2019. Case Study, Montenegro. In Parliamentary Boycotts in the Western Balkans, ed. E. Atanasovski, pp. 68-87. Westminster Foundation for Democracy.
• Krasniqi, A. 2019. Case Study, Albania. In Parliamentary Boycotts in the Western Balkans, ed. E. Atanasovski, pp. 7-29. Westminster Foundation for Democracy.
• Laštro, C. & Bieber, F. 2021. The Performance of Opposition Parties in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes: Three Case Studies from the Western Balkans. European Political Science 20 (4), 617-629.
• Levitsky, S. & Ziblatt, D. 2018. How democracies die. New York: Crown Publishing.
• Levitsky, S. & Way, L. A. 2002. Elections without democracy: The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13 (2), 51-65.
• Levitsky, S. & Way, L. A. 2010. Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Levitsky, S. & Way, L. A. 2020. The New Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 31 (1), 51-65.
• Lührmann, A. & Lindberg, S. I. 2019. A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it?. Democratization 26 (7), 1095-1113.
• Lührmann, A., Tannenberg, M. & Lindberg, S. I. 2018. Regimes of the world (RoW): Opening new avenues for the comparative study of political regimes. Politics and Governance 6 (1), 60-77.
• Martinović, I. 2019. Koraci posle odluke o bojkotu izbora u Srbiji. Radio Slobodna Evropa, 17.09.2019.
• Milošević, M. 2000. Politički vodič kroz Srbiju 2000. Beograd: Medija centar.
• OSCE/ODIHR. 2022. Election Observation Mission Reports.  Last accessed 01. 05. 2022.  https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections
• Ragin, C. 2014. The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative. Oakland: University of California Press.
• Rujević, N. 2020. Povratak Dosta je bilo u pandemijskom metežu. Dojče vele, 19.12.2020.
• Schedler, A. 2002. The nested game of democratization by elections. International Political Science Review 23(1), 103-122.
• Schedler, A. 2006. The logic of electoral authoritarianism. In Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition, ed. А. Schedler, pp. 1-26. London: Lynne Rienner.
• Scheppele, K. L. 2018. Autocratic legalism. The University of Chicago Law Review 85 (2), 545-584.
• Smith, I. O. 2014. Election boycotts and hybrid regime survival. Comparative Political Studies 47 (5), 743-765.
• Spary, C. 2013. Legislative protest as disruptive democratic practice. Democratization 20(3), 392-416.
• Spasojević, D. 2021. Political Parties in Serbia. In Undermining Democracy. Processes and Institutions in Serbia 2010-2020, ed. D. Spasojević, pp. 109-132. Beograd: Crta.
• Tepavac, T. 2021. The Parliament of Serbia. In Undermining Democracy. Processes and Institutions in Serbia 2010-2020, ed. D. Spasojević, pp. 81-108. Beograd: Crta.
• Vladisavljević, N. 2019. Uspon i pad demokratije posle Petog oktobra. Beograd: Arhipelag.
• Way, L. A. & Levitsky, S. 2007. Linkage, leverage, and the post-communist divide. East European Politics and Societies 21(1), 48-66.
• Williamson, S. 2021. Elections, legitimacy, and compliance in authoritarian regimes: evidence from the Arab world. Democratization 28 (8), 1483-1504.