THE POLITICS OF CRITIQUE – ON THE SOCIO-POLITICALLY ENGAGED DIMENSION OF FOUCAULT’S METHODOLOGY

Milan Urošević

Abstract

It seems that the work of Michel Foucault has, in the last decade, attracted some attention. This attention is a result of media engaging in a sensationalist way with his work and his private life. He is usually being portrayed as a radical postmodern nihilist, while his work is being blamed for inspiring contemporary identity politics and the practice of political correctness. These developments seem to us as a good reason to go back to Foucault’s work. Since the relation between scientific work and social engagement is an important problem in contemporary social sciences and humanities, we decided to research the way Foucault conceptualized the relation between his intellectual work and his political activism.

We begin our paper by elaborating some of the most important theoretical concepts in Foucault’s work. We start from his notion of practice, as a form of social action, and then move on to the two types of practices Foucault distinguishes: discursive and non-discursive practices. In the end of this chapter, we present the notion of the “dispositive”, which Foucault defines as an interconnected system of discursive and non-discursive practices, and his notion of subjectivity, which is defined as a relation an individual has with himself. In the next chapter we engage with methodologies Foucault uses in his research. We start with archeology, a methodology he used in the beginning of his work, while researching discursive practices. We then move on to genealogy, which is a methodology Foucault used to study systems that combine discursive and non-discursive practices. Since genealogy is the methodology, he envisions as being connected to political practice, we will especially focus on it.

Precisely in the next chapter of our paper we will investigate the ways in which Foucault conceptualizes the relationship between genealogical research and political activism. We will show that he sees political activism as a primary criterion for choosing a research subject. Genealogical research then, for Foucault, provides a reflection on the history of an institution, around which the political struggle in question is waged. The results of the genealogical research are, for him, suppose to show how the institution in question is a product of contingent historical processes and, therefore, can be changed through political action, since it is not grounded in any metaphysical necessity.

In the last chapter of our analysis, we will deal with Foucault’s attempt to connect his genealogical research and political activism through an ethical framework. In this chapter we will present his concept of enlightenment, as an ethical tradition in which both his intellectual and political work can be situated. He conceptualizes the enlightenment as an “attitude”, which consist of various kinds of practices, through which an individual constantly tests and transgresses existing boundaries, which are imposed on our actions and forms of subjectivity. Therefore, through these practices the individual, by his very existence, shows that those boundaries are contingent, and can be changed.

In the conclusion our paper we, again, turn to contemporary characterizations of Foucault’s work. We show that our elaboration of his ideas proves those characterization as inadequate and wrong.

References

• Agamben, Đorđo. 2012. Dispozitiv i drugi eseji. Novi Sad: Adresa.
• Altiser, Luj. 2009. Ideologija i državni i ideološki aparati. Loznica: Karpos
• Antonić, Slobodan. 2013. „Uvod u sociologiju kulturnog rata (sa kratkim osvrtom na Srbiju).” Letopis Matice srpske 492 (4): 445–460.
• Batler, Džudit. 2018. „Šta je kritika? Ogled o Fukoovoj vrlini.” U Šta je kritika? ur. Adriana Zaharijević i Predrag Krstić, 93–134. Beograd: Akademska knjiga
• Behrent, C. Michael. 2010. “Accidents Happen: François Ewald, the “Antirevolutionary” Foucault, and the Intellectual Politics of the French Welfare State”. The Journal of Modern History 82 (3): 585–624. doi.org/10.1086/653042.
• Christofferson, Michael Scott. 2004. French Intellectuals Against the Left. New York: Berghahn Books.
• Crotty, Michael J. 1998. The Foundations of Social Research. London: SAGE Publications.
• Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
• Delez, Žil. 1989. Fuko. Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
• Drajfus L. Hjubert i Pol Rabinov. 2017. Mišel Fuko: Iza strukturalizma i hermeneutike. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing
• Eribon, Didije. 2014. Mišel Fuko: Biografija. Loznica: Karpos.
• Foucault, Michel. 1996. “An Aesthetics of Existence.” In Foucault Live (Interviews 1961-1984), ed. Sylvère Lotringer, 450–453. New York: Semiotext(e).
• Foucault, Michel. 1997. “The Ethics of the Concern for Self as a Practice of Freedom.” In Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth, ed. Paul Rabinow, 281–302. New York: The New Press.
• Foucault, Michel. 1998a. “A Preface to Transgression.” In Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology, ed. James D. Faubion, 69–88. New York: The New Press.
• Foucault, Michel. 1998b. “The Thought of the Outside.” In Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology, ed. James D. Faubion, 147–170. New York: The New Press.
• Foucault, Michel. 2001. Fearless Speech. Los Angeles: Semiotex(e).
• Foucault, Michel. 2010. Vladanje sobom i drugima: Predavanja na Collége de France (1982.–1983.). Zagreb: Izdanja Antibarbarus d.o.o.
• Foucault, Michel. 2015. Hrabrost istine: Vladanje sobom i drugima II, Predavanje na Collége de France (1983.–1984.). Zagreb: Sandorf & Mizantrop.
• Foucault, Michel. 2016. About the Beginning of The Hermeneutics of the Self, Lectures at Dartmouth College, 1980. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Foucault, Michel. 2019. O vladanju živima. Zagreb: Sandorf & Mizantrop.
• Foucault. Michel. 1988а. “Practicing Criticism”. Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings 1977–1984, ed. Kritzman D. Lawrence, 152–158. London: Routledge.
• Foucault. Michel. 1988б. “The Concern for Truth.” Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings 1977–1984, ed. Kritzman D. Lawrence, 255–270. London: Routledge.
• Fraser, Nancy. 1981. “Foucault on Modern Power: Empirical Insights and Normative Confusions”. PRAXIS International 3 (1): 272–287. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=239364.
• Fuko Mišel. 2014b. Tehnologije sopstva: Spisi o poznoj antici i ranom hrišćanstvu. Loznica: Karpos.
• Fuko, Mišel. 1971. Riječi i stvari. Beograd: Nolit.
• Fuko, Mišel. 1982. Istorija seksualnosti: Volja za znanjem. Beograd: Prosveta.
• Fuko, Mišel. 1988. Istorija seksualnosti: Staranje o sebi. Beograd: Prosveta.
• Fuko, Mišel. 1997. Nadzirati i kažnjavati. Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
• Fuko, Mišel. 1998a. Arheologija znanja. Beograd: Plato.
• Fuko, Mišel. 1998b. Treba braniti društvo: Predavanja na Kolež de Fransu iz 1976. godine. Novi Sad: Svetovi.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2003. Hermeneutika subjekta: Predavanja na Kolež de Fransu 1981.–1982. Novi Sad: Svetovi.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2005. Rađanje biopolitike: Predavanja na Kolež de Fransu 1978.–1979. Novi Sad: Svetovi.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2007. Poredak diskursa: Pristupno predavanje na Kolež de Fransu, održano 2. decembra 1970. godine. Loznica: Karpos.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2010b. „Niče, genealogija, istorija.” U Spisi i razgovori, ur. Mladen Kozomara, 59–88. Beograd: Fedon.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2010c. „Istina i moć.” U Spisi i razgovori, ur. Mladen Kozomara, 140–168. Beograd: Fedon.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2010d. „Razgovor sa Mišelom Fukoom.” U Spisi i razgovori, ur. Mladen Kozomara, 168–243. Beograd: Fedon.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2010e. „Šta je prosvećenost?” U Spisi i razgovori, ur. Mladen Kozomara, 412–433. Beograd: Fedon.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2010g. „Prašina i oblak.” U Spisi i razgovori, ur. Mladen Kozomara, 281–313. Beograd: Fedon.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2010а. „Odgovor na jedno pitanje.” U Spisi i razgovori, ur. Mladen Kozomara, 29–58. Beograd: Fedon.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2012. Moć/znanje. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2014a. Bezbednost, teritorija, stanovništvo: Predavanja na Kolež na Fransu 1977.–1978. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2017b. „Povodom genealogije etike: pogled na rad u toku.” U Mišel Fuko: Iza strukturalizma i hermeneutike, ur. Hjubert L. Drajfus i Pol Rabinov, 310–336. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2017а. „Dva ogleda o subjektu i moći.” U Mišel Fuko: Iza strukturalizma i hermeneutike, ur. Hjubert L. Drajfus i Pol Rabinov, 286–309. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.
• Fuko, Mišel. 2018. „Šta je kritika?” U Šta je kritika? ur. Adriana Zaharijević i Predrag Krstić, 35–92. Beograd: Akademska knjiga.
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1988. Filozofski diskurs moderne. Zagreb: Globus.
• Hardy, Nick. 2013. „A History of the Method: Examining Foucault’s Research Methodology.” In The Edinburgh Companion to Poststructuralism, eds. Dillet Benoît, Iain MacKenzie and Robert Porte, 95–121. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Huffer, Lynne. 2020. Foucault’s Strange Eros. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Ivković, Marjan. 2006. „Fuko versus Habermas: moderna kao nedovršeni projekat naspram teorije. moći – neizbežna suprotstavljenost ili mogućnost komunikacije.” Filozofija i društvo 30: 59–76. doi.org/10.2298/FID0630059I.
• Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Pravno–politički spisi. Zagreb: Politička kultura: Nakladno istraživački zavod.
• Kelly, Mark, G. E. 2021. “Must We Cancel Foucault?” Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary. Poslednji pristup 15. jun 2022. http://www.telospress.com/must-we-cancel-foucault/.
• Koopman, Colin. 2013. Genealogy as Critique: Foucault and the Problems of Modernity. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
• Korać, Veljko. 1970. „Na izvoru transendentalnog idealizma.” U Kritika čistog uma, Kant, Imanuel. V–XLIV. Beograd: Kultura.
• Mahon, Michael. 1992. Foucault’s Nietzschean Genealogy. New York: State University of New York.
• Miller, Daniel. 2020. “Is Foucault responsible for identity politics?”. The Critic. Poslednji pristup 15. jun 2022. https://thecritic.co.uk/is-foucault-responsible-for-identity-politics/.
• Negri, Antonio. 2017. Marx and Foucault: Essays, Volume 1. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Niče, Fridrih. 1993. S one strane dobra i zla/Genealogija morala. Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga.
• Paras, Eric. 2006. Foucault 2.0: Beyond Power and Knowledge. New York: Other Press.
• Peterson, Jordan. 2017. “Foucault The Reprehensible & Derrida The Trickster.” YouTube. Poslednji pristup 15. jun 2022. https://youtu.be/NBFSDd_5tiE.
• Petković, Krešimir. 2018. Istina kao kušnja: Foucault, politička znanost, politička etika. Zagreb: Plejada.
• Petrović, Dalibor. 2021. „Kultura otkazivanja kao hibridni obrazac postmoderne društvenosti“. Kultura polisa 18 (46): 169–181. doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2021.18.3r.46.
• Prado, C. G. 2000. Starting with Foucault: An Introduction to Genealogy. Oxford: Westview Press.
• Romero, Mary. 2020. “Sociology Engaged in Social Justice.” American Sociological Review 00 (0): 1–30, (2019 Presidential Address). doi.org/10.1177%2F0003122419893677.
• Sailer, Steve. 2019. „The Whip Hand.” Taki’s Magazine. Poslednji pristup 15. jun 2022. https://www.takimag.com/article/the-whip-hand/.
• Schubert, Kristen. 2020. “Freedom as critique: Foucault beyond anarchism.” Philosophy and Social Criticism XX (X): 1–26. doi.org/10.1177%2F0191453720917733.
• Smith, Daniel W. 2012. Essays on Deleuze. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
• Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1993. Outside in the Teaching Machine. New York: Routledgde
• Taylor, Charles. 1984. “Foucault on freedom and truth.” Political theory 12 (2): 152–183. doi.org/10.1177%2F0090591784012002002.
• Urošević, Milan. 2021. „Pravila praksi: O metodologiji u radu Mišela Fukoa.” Etnoantropološki problemi 16 (1): 283–302. doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i1.12.
• Veber, Maks. 1976. Privreda i društvo I. Beograd: Prosveta.
• Veber, Maks. 1998. Duhovni rad kao poziv. Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
• Ven, Pol. 2014. Fuko: Kao mislilac i čovek. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.
• Zaharijević, Adriana i Predrag Krstić. 2018. „U čemu je vrlina kritike? (Predgovor).” U Šta je kritika? ur. Adriana Zaharijević i Predrag Krstić, 7–34. Beograd: Akademska knjiga.