“SPIRIT IN A WORLD WITHOUT SPIRIT” – FOUCAULT’S INTERPRETATION OF THE IRANIAN REVOLUTION AND RESISTANCE TO WESTERN MODERNITY

Milan Urošević

Abstract

In this article, we analyze Foucault’s research of the Iranian Revolution, conducted at the end of 1978. This research has made Foucault the target of numerous criticisms from his contemporaries, while later interpreters of his work have tried in various ways to understand how this research relates to the rest of his oeuvre. A review of the relevant literature shows that there are different currents in interpreting the place that the study of the Iranian Revolution has in Foucault’s work. One of these currents argues that Foucault was “seduced” by the “irrational” aspects of Islam because his theoretical and epistemological standpoints inherently contain anti-Enlightenment aspects. A certain number of authors also agree on the interpretation that sees inconsistency in Foucault’s study of the Iranian Revolution, as they believe that at this point, he abandons his understanding of power as a totalizing mechanism and introduces the idea of a free acting subject. We will attempt to show that both currents miss the most important aspect of Foucault’s research of the Iranian Revolution, which is the way this research fits into his academic interests at that time. Specifically, we will try to locate his study of the Iranian Revolution within the framework of his academic research in the late 1970s, as well as show how the socio-political context of France at that time influenced his work. We will start the article by examining the relationship between French left-leaning intellectuals and the French Communist Party during this period, as well as their stance on the coalition between the French Communist Party and the Socialist Party. We will show that due to the influence of cooperation with Maoist organizations and his participation in the student revolt of 1968, Foucault developed a negative attitude towards the Stalinist orientations of the French Communist Party and therefore at that time tries to develop a theoretical framework for a non-Marxist understanding of macro-social reality. In such a context, Foucault develops his theory of “governmentality”, which refers to the specific logic of social relations that regulates the institutions of society in a given historical period. The set of institutions and social relations that governmentality regulates he calls a “dispositive”. Foucault’s research leads him to the conclusion that the dispositive regulating contemporary society is guided by the logic he calls “pastoral governmentality”, claiming that it involves regulating individuals’ actions through their dimension of subjectivity, i.e., through the way they relate to themselves and manage their behavior. Furthermore, he demonstrates how this logic, rooted in the Catholic Church, extends to other social institutions from the seventeenth century and becomes associated with the capitalist mode of production in the eighteenth century. It then assumes a role in regulating individuals’ subjectivity in accordance with the concept of the individual as homo economicus. Aligning with his concept of governmentality, Foucault develops the notion of “counter-conduct” as a form of resistance to pastoral governmentality. This idea involves rejecting the prescribed model of subjectivity and, consequently, developing practices that transcend the power relations shaped by pastoral governmentality. We will demonstrate that Foucault’s research of the Iranian Revolution serves as a real-time, practical test of his idea of counter-conduct. Namely, he claimed that the reforms of the Iranian Shah aimed at establishing a dispositive guided by the pastoral logic of governmentality. Therefore, he sees the Iranian Revolution as a collective revolt against the dispositive that has been dominant in Western countries since the seventeenth century. In his study of the Iranian Revolution, he is particularly interested in the role of Shia Islam in regulating practices of resistance. He sees Shiism as the discourse through which the Iranian Revolution as a collective form of counter-conduct is coordinated and argues that this form of Islam allows revolutionaries to transform their subjectivity by rejecting the model of subjectivity prescribed by pastoral governmentality. Finally, the article concludes with a review of two ways in which the study of the Iranian Revolution fundamentally affects Foucault’s work. The first way involves a shift in the focus of his research, which from 1979. becomes centered on the phenomenon of subjectivity. Thus, during the 1980s, Foucault’s work involves exploring various models of subjectivity in the history of Western culture. The second influence of the Iranian Revolution can be observed in Foucault’s renewed focus on the concept and phenomenon of the Enlightenment.

References

Afary, Janet, and Kevin B. Anderson. 2005. Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the Seductions of Islamism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Almond, Ian. 2007. The New Orientalists: Postmodern representations of Islam from Foucault to Baudrillard. London: I.B. Tauris.

Atoussa H. 2005. “An Iranian Woman Writes.” In Foucault and the Iranian Revolution Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, eds. Janet Afary and Kevin B. Anderson, 209–210. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Beaulieu, Alain. 2010. “Towards a liberal Utopia: The connection between Foucault’s reporting on the Iranian Revolution and the ethical turn.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (7): 801–818. doi: 10.1177/0191453710372065.

Behrent, Michael C. 2016. “Liberalism without Humanism: Michel Foucault and the Free-Market Creed, 1976–1979.” In Foucault and Neoliberalism, eds. Daniel Zamora and Michael C. Behrent, 33–69. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beukes, Johann. 2020. Foucault in Iran 1978–1979. Cape Town: AOSIS Publishing.

Broyelle, Claudie, and Jacques Broyelle. 2005. “What Are the Philosophers Dreaming About? Was Michel Foucault Mistaken about the Iranian Revolution?” In Foucault and the Iranian Revolution Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, eds. Janet Afary and Kevin B. Anderson, 247–249. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Carrette, Jeremy R. 2000. Foucault and Religion: Spiritual corporality and political spirituality. London: Routledge.

Chiurazzi, Gaetano. 2022. “Critique as a Microphysics of Freedom: A Disposition Beyond the Dispositive.” In Violence and Reflexivity, eds. Marjan Ivković, Adriana Zaharijević and Gazela Pudar Draško, 119–134. London: Lexington Books.

Christofferson, Michael Scott. 2004. French Intellectuals Against the Left. New York: Berghahn Books.

Cornell, Drucilla, and Stephen D. Seely. 2016. The Spirit of Revolution: Beyond the Dead Ends of Man. Cambridge: Polity.

Deleuze, Gilles, i Felix Guattari. 2013. Tisuću platoa. Zagreb: Sandor & Mizantrop.

Delez, Žil, i Kler Parne. 2009. Dijalozi. Beograd: Fedon.

Duschinsky, Robbie. 2006. “ ‘The First Great Insurrection against Global Systems’ Foucault’s Writings on the Iranian Revolution.” European Journal of Social Theory 9 (4): 547–558.

Eribon, Didije. 2014. Mišel Fuko: Biografija. Loznica: Karpos.

Foucault, Michel. 1984. “Politics and Ethics: An Interview.” In The Foucault Reader, ed. Paul Rabinow, 373–380. New York: Pantheon Books.

Foucault, Michel. 1990. “Power and Sex.” In Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Intervews and Other Writings 1977–1984, ed. Lawrence D. Kritzman, 110–124. New York: Routledge.

Foucault, Michel. 1996. “An Aesthetics of Existence.” In Foucault Live (Interviews 1961–1984), ed. Sylvere Lotringer, 450–453. New York: Semiotext(e).

Foucault, Michel. 1998. “The Thought of the Outside.” In Aesthetics, method, and epistemology, ed. James D. Faubion, 147–170. New York: The New Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2005a. “The Shah Is a Hundred Years Behind the Times.” In Foucault and the Iranian Revolution Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, ed. Janet Afary and Kevin B. Anderson, 194–198. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2005b. “Tehran: Faith against the Shah.” In Foucault and the Iranian Revolution Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, ed. Janet Afary and Kevin B. Anderson, 198–203. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2005c. “What Are the Iranians Dreaming About?” In Foucault and the Iranian Revolution Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, ed. Janet Afary and Kevin B. Anderson, 203–209. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2005d. “Foucault’s Response to Atoussa H.” In Foucault and the Iranian Revolution Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, ed. Janet Afary and Kevin B. Anderson, 210. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2005e. “A Revolt with Bare Hands.” In Foucault and the Iranian Revolution Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, ed. Janet Afary and Kevin B. Anderson, 210–213. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2005f. “The Mythical Leader of the Iranian Revolt.” In Foucault and the Iranian Revolution Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, ed. Janet Afary and Kevin B. Anderson, 220–222. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2005g. “Iran: The Spirit of a World without Spirit: Foucault’s Conversation with Claire Brière and Pierre Blanchet.” In Foucault and the Iranian Revolution Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, ed. Janet Afary and Kevin B. Anderson, 250–260. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2005h. “Open Letter to Prime Minister Mehdi Bazargan.” In Foucault and the Iranian Revolution Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, ed. Janet Afary and Kevin B. Anderson, 260–263. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2005i. “Is It Useless to Revolt?” In Foucault and the Iranian Revolution Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, ed. Janet Afary and Kevin B. Anderson, 263–267. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2014. “Interview with Christian Panier and Pierre Watté.” In Wrong-doing, Truth-Telling: The Function of Avowal in Justice, ed. Fabienne Brion i Bernard E. Harcourt, 247–252. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Fuko, Mišel. 1982. Istorija seksualnosti: Volja za znanjem. Beograd: Prosveta.

Fuko, Mišel. 1997. Nadzirati i kažnjavati. Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.

Fuko, Mišel. 1998a. Arheologija znanja. Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.

Fuko, Mišel. 1998b. Treba braniti društvo. Novi Sad: Svetovi.

Fuko, Mišel. 2003. Hermeneutika subjekta. Novi Sad: Svetovi.

Fuko, Mišel. 2005a. Rađanje biopolitike. Novi Sad: Svetovi.

Fuko, Mišel. 2005b. Psihijatrijska moć. Novi Sad: Svetovi.

Fuko, Mišel. 2010a. „Razgovor sa Mišelom Fukoom.” U Mišel Fuko: Spisi i razgovori, ur. Mladen Kozomara, 168–243. Beograd: Fedon.

Fuko, Mišel. 2010b. „Šta je prosvećenost?” U Mišel Fuko: Spisi i razgovori, ur. Mladen Kozomara, 412–433. Beograd: Fedon.

Fuko, Mišel. 2012. Moć/znanje. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.

Fuko, Mišel. 2014. Bezbednost, teritorija, stanovništvo. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.

Fuko, Mišel. 2017. „Dva ogleda o subjektu i moći.” U Mišel Fuko: Iza strukturalizma i hermeneutike, Hjubert L. Drajfus i Pol Rabinov, 286–309. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.

Fuko, Mišel. 2018. „Šta je kritika.” U Šta je kritika?, ur. Adriana Zaharijević i Predrag Krstić, 35–92. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga.

Gamez, Patrick. 2018. “The place of the Iranian Revolution in the history of truth: Foucault on neoliberalism, spirituality and enlightenment.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (1): 96–124. doi: 10.1177/0191453718794751.

Ghamari-Tabrizi, Behrooz. 2016. Foucault in Iran: Islamic Revolution after the Enlightenment. London: University of Minesota Press.

Huffer, Lynne. 2020. Foucault’s Strange Eros. New York: Columbia University Press.

Paras, Eric. 2006. Foucault 2.0: Beyond Power and Knowledge. New York: Power Press.

Illott, Luke. 2022. “Generalizing Resistance: The Coalition Politics of Foucault’s Governmentality Lectures.” The Review of Politics 85 (1): 48–72. doi: 10.1017/S0034670522000882.

Illot, Luke. 2023. “Genealogy Beyond Critique: Foucault’s Discipline and Punish as Coalitional Worldmaking.” Political Theory 51 (2): 331–354. doi: 10.1177/00905917221103296.

Keating, Craig. 1997. “Reflections on the Revolution in Iran: Foucault on resistance.” Journal of European Studies 27: 181–197. doi: 10.1177/004724419702700204.

Koopman, Colin. 2013. Genealogy as Critique: Foucault and the Problems of Modernity. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Lazreg, Marnia. 2017. Foucault’s Orient: The Conundrum of Cultural Difference, from Tunisia to Japan. New York: Berghahn Books.

Leezenberg, Michiel. 1998. “Power and Political Spirituality: Michel Foucault on the Islamic Revolution in Iran.” In Cultural History after Foucault, ed. John Neubauer, 63–82. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Leezenberg, Michiel. 2018. “Foucault and Iran Reconsidered: Revolt, Religion, and Neoliberalism.” Iran Namag 3 (2): 4–28.

Macey, David. 2019. The Lives of Michel Foucault. London: Verso Books.

McCall, Corey. 2013. “Ambivalent Modernities: Foucault’s Iranian Writings Reconsidered.” Foucault Studies 15: 27–51.

McWhorter, Ladelle. 2003. “Foucault’s political spirituality.” Philosophy Today 47 (5): 39–44. doi: 10.5840/philtoday200347supplement6.

Milić, Vojin. 1978. Sociološki metod. Beograd: Nolit.

Miller, James. 1993. The Passion of Michel Foucault. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Noseto, Lusijano. 2022. Mišel Fuko i politika. Loznica: Karpos.

Owen, David. 2005. Maturity and Modernity: Nietzsche, Weber, Foucault and the Ambivalence of Reason. London: Routledge.

Petković, Krešimir. 2018. Istina kao kušnja. Zagreb: Plejada.

Poulantzas, Nicos. 1981. Država, vlast, socijalizam. Zagreb: OOUR Globus.

Rossi, Andrea. 2017. “Foucault, critique, subjectivity.” Journal for Cultural Research 21 (4): 1–14. doi: 10.1080/14797585.2017.1370486.

Saar, Martin. 2008. “Understanding Genealogy: History, Power, and the Self.” Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3): 295–314. doi: 10.1163/187226308X335976.

Scullion, Rosemarie. 1995. “Michel Foucault the Orientalist: On Revolutionary Iran and the ‘Spirit of Islam’.” South Central Review 12 (2): 16–40. doi: 10.2307/3189968.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1993. Outside in the Teaching Machine. New York: Routledgde.

Stauth, Georg. 1991. “Revolution in Spiritless Times: An Essey on Michel Foucault’s Enquiries into The Iranian Revolution.” International Sociology 6 (3): 259–280. doi: 10.1177/026858091006003001.

Strozier, Robert M. 2002. Foucault, Subjectivity and Identity. Detroit: Wayne state University Press.

Urošević, Milan. 2023. „Politika kritike – O društveno-politički angažovanoj dimenziji Fukoove metodologije.” Srpska politička misao 79 (1): 163–187. doi: 10.5937/spm79-42698.

Žižek, Slavoj. 2011. U odbranu izgubljenih stvari. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga.