THE INTERPLAY OF DEMOCRACY AND TRADE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CHINA AND THE EU IN EURASIAN RELATIONS

Nenad Stekić

Jovana Nikolić

Abstract

This paper investigates trade cooperation dynamics across the expansive Eurasian region, with a specific focus on the theoretical underpinnings of the democratic peace concept. It delves into the evolving trade and political relationships between 26 Eurasian countries and two prominent global actors – China and the European Union, spanning the period from 2007 to the Ukrainian crisis in 2022. Through an examination of statistical correlations between trade variables – namely, export and import – and factors such as free trade agreements, shifts in political regime types, institutional stability of Eurasian nations, and their membership within economic alliances, this research provides a nuanced perspective on the evolution of interactions between EU/China and Eurasia. The findings underscore a notable expansion in trade cooperation among the analysed cases since 2007, despite occasional tensions and divergent geopolitical interests involving China and the EU. Statistical analyses further reveal that the dynamics of export and import between the EU and Eurasian countries align with the stability of political regimes in Eurasia. Conversely, in the case of China, moderately negative correlations emerge. Importantly, trade patterns exhibit variations among individual countries, irrespective of their political regime dynamics, institutional stability, or membership in economic alliances – a phenomenon warranting in-depth exploration within the confines of this paper. The paper concludes by discussing how the findings challenge the postulates of commercial liberalism as part of democratic peace theory in the Eurasian context. The analysis clearly demonstrates that, with the EU and China as the two main global economic actors, these ideas need to be theoretically redefined to accurately capture the dynamics at play in the region in future.

References

ASEAN. n. d. “ASEAN-China Economic Relations.” ASEAN. Last accessed 15 December 2023. https://asean.org/our-communities/economic-community/integration-with-global-economy/asean-china-economic-relation/.

Balding, Christopher. 2011. “A re-examination of the relation between democracy and international trade.” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development: An International and Comparative Review 20 (5): 585-603. doi: 10.1080/09638190903159457.

Bremer, Struart A. 1993. “Democracy and militarized interstate conflict, 1816–1965.” International Interactions 18 (3): 231-249. doi: 10.1080/03050629308434806.

CIA. n. d. “Population – 2021 World Factbook Archive.” Central Intelligence Agency. Last accessed 15 December 2023. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/about/archives/2021/field/population/country-comparison.

Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, David Altman, Michael Bernhard, et al. [V-Dem]. 2021. “V-Dem Codebook v11”. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.

Collier, Paul, and Anke Hoeffler. 2002. “Aid, Policy and Peace: Reducing the risks of civil conflict.” Defence and Peace Economics 13 (6): 435-450. doi: 10.1080/10242690214335.

De Bruijn, Jurriën. 2014. “The role of regime types on bilateral trade levels.” Bachelor’s Thesis. Erasmus University Rotterdam.

Doyle, Michael W. 1986. “Liberalism and World Politics.” American Political Science Review 80 (4): 1151-1169. doi: 10.2307/1960861. 

Đorđević, Branislav, and Nenad Stekić. 2022. “Beyond China’s Grand Strategy cultivation: Connectivity as neglected variable.” In The Connectivity Cooperation Between China and Europe, eds. Liu Zuokui and Branislav Đorđević, 51-71. Routledge.

European Commission. n. d. “Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN).” European Commission. Last accessed 15 December 2023. https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/association-south-east-asian-nations-asean_en. 

European Commission. n. d. a. “EU trade by country/region.” European Commission. Last accessed 15 December 2023. https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions_en.

European Commission. n. d. b. “Non-EU markets.” European Commission. Last accessed 15 December 2023. https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/non-eu-markets.

European Commission. n. d. c. “Negotiations and agreements.” European Commission. Last accessed 15 December 2023. https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/negotiations-and-agreements_en.

European Commission. n. d. d. “EU trade statistics (including United Kingdom).” European Commission. Last accessed 4 January 2024. https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/statistics?includeUK=true.

Eurostat. 2023. “International trade in goods by partner.” Statistics Explained. Last accessed 4 January 2024.  https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=International_trade_in_goods_by_partner#Focus_on_EU_trade_in_goods_-_an_overview.

Francois, Joseph, and Manfred Elsig. 2021. “Briefing: Short overview of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).” Last accessed 15 December 2023. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/653625/EXPO_BRI(2021)653625_EN.pdf.

Gajić, Aleksandar, and Nikola Rajić. 2023. “A Decade of the Belt and Road Initiative in Central Asia: Geopolitical Perspective.” In New Chinese Initiative for a Changing Global Security – Conference Proceedings, eds. Nenad Stekić and Aleksandar Mitić, 185-197. Belgrade: Institute of International Politics and Economics.

Garcia, Maria. 2010. “Fears and Strategies: The European Union, China and their Free Trade Agreements in East Asia.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 6 (4): 496-513. doi:10.30950/jcer.v6i4.311.

Hegre, Håvard, John R Oneal, and Bruce Russett [Hegre et al.]. 2001. “Trade does promote peace: New simultaneous estimates of the reciprocal effects of trade and conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 47 (6): 763–774. doi: 10.1177/0022343310385995.

HKTDC. 2023. “Economic and Trade Information on China.” HKTDC Research. Last modified 25 January 2024. https://research.hktdc.com/en/article/MzIwNjcyMDYx.

Kegley, Charles Jr., and Margaret Hermann. 1996. “How Democracies Use Intervention: A Neglected Dimension in Studies of the Democratic Peace.” Journal of Peace Research 33 (3): 309-322. doi: 10.1177/0022343396033003005.

Luptáková, Anabela. 2021. “The European Union’s Foreign Trade Cooperation with Eurasian Economic Union: Selected Indices.” Ekonomické rozhľady – Economic Review 50 (2): 222-236.

Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and B. Peter Rosendorff [Mansfield et al.]. 2000. “Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 305-321. doi: 10.2307/2586014. 

McBride, James, and Andrew Chatzky. 2019. “The U.S. Trade Deficit: How Much Does It Matter?” Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-trade-deficit-how-much-does-it-matter.

McDonald, Patrick J. 2004. “Peace through Trade or Free Trade?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (4): 547-572. doi: 10.1177/0022002704266117.

Meunier, Sophie, and Kalypso Nikolaïdis. 2005. “The European Union as a Trade Power.” In International Relations and the European Union, eds. Christopher Hill, Michael Smith and Sophie Vanhoonacker, 155-180. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mitić, Aleksandar. 2023. “Statecraft Repertoires of China and the U.S, Before and During the Conflict in Ukraine.” Politika nacionalne bezbednosti 24 (1): 29-59.

MOFCOM. n. d. “China FTA Network.” Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China. Last accessed 15 December 2023. http://fta.mofcom.gov.cn/english/index.shtml.

Oneal, John R., and Bruce Russett. 1997. “The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (2): 267-294. doi: 10.1111/1468-2478.00042.

Papadopoulos, Georgios D., Lykourgos Magafas, Konstantinos Demertzis, and Ioannis Antoniou [Papadopoulos et al.]. 2023. “Analyzing Global Geopolitical Stability in Terms of World Trade Network Analysis.” Information 14 (8): 442. doi: 10.3390/info14080442. 

Polachek, Solomon W. 1980. “Conflict and Trade.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 24 (1): 55-78. doi: 10.1177/002200278002400103.

Polachek, Solomon W., John Robst and Yuan-Ching Chang [Polachek et al.]. 1999. “Liberalism and Interdependence: Extending the Trade-Conflict Model.” Journal of Peace Research 36 (4): 405-422. doi: 10.1177/0022343399036004002.

Pollins, Brian M. 1989. “Conflict, Cooperation, and Commerce: The Effect of International Political Interactions on Bilateral Trade Flows.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (3): 737-761. doi: 10.2307/2111070.

Rothacher, Albrecht. 2021. “External Trade: The Roles of the EU, of the Eurasian Economic Union and of China.” In Putinomics: How the Kremlin Damages the Russian Economy, 305-315. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Rummel, R. J. 2017. Power Kills: Democracy as a Method of Nonviolence. Routledge.

Sampson, Michael, and Tom Theuns. 2023. “Comparing Chinese and EU trade agreement strategies: lessons for normative power Europe?” International Relations: 1-24. doi: 10.1177/00471178231153554.

Simon, Michael W., and Erik Gartzke. 1996. “Political System Similarity And The Choice of Allies: Do Democracies Flock Together, or Do Opposites Attract?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 40 (4): 617-635. doi: 10.1177/0022002796040004005.

Statista Research Department. 2023. “Trade turnover of Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) countries with China from 2011 to 2021 (in billion U.S. dollars).” Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1087430/eaeu-trade-volume-with-china/.

World Integrated Trade Solution [WITS]. n. d. “China trade balance, exports and imports by country 2021.” World Integrated Trade Solution. Last accessed 4 January 2024. https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/CHN/Year/2021/TradeFlow/EXPIMP/Partner/by-country.

Wilson, Jeanne L. 2018. “The Eurasian Economic Union and China’s silk road: implications for the Russian–Chinese relationship.” European Politics and Society 17 (sup1): 113-132. doi: 10.1080/23745118.2016.1171288.

Zakić, Katarina. 2020. “The results and risks of China’s Belt and Road investment projects in Serbia.” The Review of International Affairs 71, 1180: 45-71.

Zhanakova, Nazigul Nurlanovna, and Faya Ahmetovna Shulenbaeva. 2016. “Modern Trends in Trade and Economic Relations between the Eurasian Economic Union Members and China.” Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 7 (2): 442-449.