THE PROBLEM OF THE LEGITIMACY OBJECT IN SOCIO – LEGAL RESEARCH

Anja Bezbradica

Abstract

Although traditionally a political science topic, in the last three decades legitimacy has become a subject of interest for researchers in the field of sociology of law who deal with the issue of compliance with law. Significant differences among researchers in this field, initially concerning the definition of legitimacy and subsequently its operationalization, frequently result in the inability to compare findings across various studies. To establish a more coherent conceptual and methodological framework for future socio-legal research on legitimacy, we identified three areas with the greatest ambiguity: 1. object of legitimacy, 2. operationalization of legitimacy in empirical research, and 3. sources of legitimacy. This paper aims to examine the first question. It employs conceptual analysis as a method to explore the objects of legitimacy relevant to legal behavior studies. Through a review of theoretical literature and notable empirical studies, the paper asserts that legitimacy can be attributed to three distinct objects: 1. institutions, 2. officials, and 3. legal acts. We can speak of institutional legitimacy the authority that implements the law is the one towards which the support of the relevant public is directed, which is why people feel compelled to obey its directives. The legitimacy of officials signifies the support directed toward individuals occupying institutional positions and their particular policies. Legal acts may be legitimate for both substantive and formal reasons. Substantive legitimacy of legal acts arises when the public agrees with the content of their norms. In the case formal legitimacy of legal acts, individuals may feel oblgated to adhere to laws and other legal acts due to their formal validity, meaning they were enacted by the competent authority in the prescribed procedure. These three legitimations intertwine and condition each other, which is why they need to be studied in interaction. Since compliance with law can derive from the legitimacy of different objects, it is important for socio-legal studies to empirically explore, within each context, legitimacy of which object serves as the primary motivator for behavior, alongwith explaining their interplay.

References

Kелзен, Ханс. 2010. Општа теорија државе и права. Београд: ЈП „Службени гласник” и Правни факултет Универзитета у Београду.

Харт, Херберт. 2013. Појам права. Београд: ЈП „Службени гласник” и Правни факултет Универзитета у Београду.

Berger, Joseph, Ridgeway, Cecilia L., Fisek, M. Hamit & Norman, Robert Z. 1998. The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63(3), pp. 379 – 405.

Bovan Saša B. 2014. Osnovi sociologije prava. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Fallon, Richard H. Jr. 2005. Legitimacy and the Constitution. Harvard Law Review, 118 (6), pp. 1787 – 1853.

French, John & Raven, Bertram. 1959. “The bases of social power”. In Dоrwin Cartwright (Ed.) Studies in social power (pp. 150 – 167). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan – Institute for Social Reseach.

Fridman, Lorens M. 2014. Pravni sistem. Podgorica: CID.

Gibson, James L. & Caldeira, Gregory A. 2003. Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court. The Journal of Politics, 65(1), pp. 1 – 30. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00001

Hertogh, Marc. 2015. What Moves Joe Driver? How Perceptions of Legitimacy
Shape Regulatory Compliance among Dutch Traffic Offenders. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 43(2), pp. 214 – 234.

Hertz, John H. 1978. Legitimacy, can we retrieve it?. Comparative Politics, 10(3), pp. 317 – 343.

Hyde, Alan. 1983. The Concept of Legitimation in the Sociology of Law. Wisconsin Law Review, pp. 379 – 426.

Johnson, Cathryn, Dowd, Timothy J. & Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2006. Legitimacy as a Social Process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32 (1), pp. 53 – 78.

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. Political Man, The Social Basis of Politics. New York: Doubleday.

Mrakovčić, Marko & Vuković, Danilo. 2019. Unutarnja kriza pravosuđa? Stavovi pripadnika pravničkih profesija o pravosuđu u Hrvatskoj i Srbiji. Politička misao, 56 (1), pp. 75 – 105. doi: 10.20901/pm.56.1.03

Murphy, Kristina, Tyler, Tom & Curtis Amy. 2009. Nurturing regulatory compliance: is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law?. Regulation & Governance, 3(1), pp. 1 – 26. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01043.x

Troyer, Lisa. 2007. “Legitimacy”, In George Ritzer (Ed.) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (pp. 2584 – 2587), Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.

Tyler, Tom R. [1990] 2021. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press. Reprint, Princeton: Princeton University Press. 73

Tyler, Tom R. 2000. Social justice: outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), pp. 117 – 125. doi: 10.1080/002075900399411

Tyler, Tom R. 2003. Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 30(1), pp. 283 – 358. doi:10.1086/652233

Tyler, Tom R. 2006. Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), pp. 375 – 400. doi: 10.1146/annurev.
psych.57.102904.190038

Tyler, Tom R. 2009. Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: The Benefits of Self – Regulation. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 7(1), pp. 307 – 360.

Tyler, Tom R. & Blader, Steven. 2003. The Group Engagement Model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), pp. 349 – 361. doi: 10.1207/
s15327957pspr0704_07

Tyler, Tom R. & Lind, Allan E. 1992. A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 25(1), pp. 115 – 191. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60283-x

Tyler, Tom R. & Trinkner, Rick. 2017. Why children follow rules: Legal socialization and the development of legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DeCremer, David & Tyler, Tom R. 2005. “Managing group behavior: the interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation”, In

Mark P. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 151 – 218). New York: Academic.

Dogan, Mattei. 2013. “Conceptions of Legitimacy”, In Mary Hawkesworth & Maurice Kogan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Government and Politics (pp. 116 – 126). London and New York: Taylor and Francis.

Easton, David. 1958. The Perception of Authority and Political Change. NOMOS: American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, 1(1), pp. 170 – 196.

Easton, David. 1975. A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), pp. 435 – 457. doi: 10.1017/
S0007123400008309