CORONAVIRUS AND SCIENCE-RELATED COMMUNICATION BY POPULIST PARTIES

Mirko Crulli

Сажетак

The relation between science and populism has already been investigated by relevant sociopolitical literature. However, the Covid-19 pandemic has produced remarkable changes in how politics, science, and society relate to each other. Therefore, there is a need to explore further what science is to populists and how populist parties have dealt with science in times of pandemic. How much has science-related communication by populist parties changed after the outbreak of Coronavirus? What topics have populist science-related messages been about? Are there differences in the science-related communication of ideologically different populist parties, and between populist parties in government and in opposition? The research tries to answer these questions through a thematic analysis of populist communication on Twitter. The empirical investigation is carried out through topic modelling on a dataset of 1.133 science-related populist tweets. The focus is on a pertinent single case study, Italy. Here there are three different populist parties in terms of ideology, which have been both in government and in opposition during the pandemic. Findings highlight that different populist parties have resorted to different science-related rhetoric and that the two Italian populist parties on the radical right, the League and FdI, have engaged in “counter-science” and “anti-science” communication.  

Референце

• Albertazzi, D., Bonansinga, D. & Zulianello, M. 2021. The right-wing alliance at the time of the Covid-19 pandemic: all change?. Contemporary Italian Politics, 13(2), 181-195.
• Alteri, L., Parks, L., Raffini, L., & Vitale, T. 2021. Covid-19 and the Structural Crisis of Liberal Democracies. Determinants and Consequences of the Governance of Pandemic. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 14(1), 1–37.
• Betz, H.-G. 2020a. COVID 19’s Victims: Populism. In Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic by the Radical Right: Scapegoating, Conspiracy Theories and New Narratives, ed. T. Bar-On & B. Molas. ibidem Press.
• Betz, H.-G. 2020b. Will France’s Marine Le Pen be a profiteer or victim of the pandemic? In Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic by the Radical Right: Scapegoating, Conspiracy Theories and New Narratives, ed. T. Bar-On & B. Molas. ibidem Press.
• Brandmayr, F. 2021. Public Epistemologies and Intellectual Interventions in Contemporary Italy. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 34(1), 47–68.
• Brubaker, R. 2020. Paradoxes of populism during the pandemic. Thesis Eleven, 1–15.
• Burni, A. 2020. Profiteers of the pandemic? COVID-19 has not killed global populism. The Current Column. https://www.die-gdi.de/en/the-current-column/article/covid-19-has-not-killed-global-populism/
• Caramani, D. 2017. Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54–67.
• Casarões, G., & Magalhães, D. 2021. The hydroxychloroquine alliance: how far-right leaders and alt-science preachers came together to promote a miracle drug. Revista de Administracao Publica, 55(1), 197–214.
• Eberl, J., Huber, R. A., & Greussing, E. 2021. From Populism to the ’Plandemic’: Why populists believe in COVID-19 conspiracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1), 272–284.
• English, O. 2020, March 18. Coronavirus’ next victim: Populism. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/coronavirus-next-victim-populism-uk-boris-johnson-us-donald-trump
• Gerbaudo, P. 2021. The Great Recoil: Politics After Populism and Pandemic. Verso.
• Hubé, N., & Bobba, G. (Ed). 2021. Populism and the Politicization of the COVID-19 Crisis in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Lasco, G., & Curato, N. 2019. Medical populism. Social Science and Medicine, 221(December 2018), 1–8.
• Mede, N. G., & Schäfer, M. S. 2020. Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science. Public Understanding of Science, 29(5), 473–491.
• Mede, N. G., Schäfer, M. S., & Füchslin, T. 2021. The SciPop Scale for Measuring Science-Related Populist Attitudes in Surveys: Development, Test, and Validation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(2), 273–293.
• Merkley, E. 2020. Anti-intellectualism, populism, and motivated resistance to expert consensus. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(1), 24–48.
• Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. 2014. Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381–397.
• Mudde, C. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563.
• Mudde, C. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
• Rooduijn, M., Van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C., & Taggart, P. 2019. The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe. www.popu-list.org
• Samaras, G. 2020. Has the coronavirus proved a crisis too far for Europe’s far right outsiders? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/has-the-coronavirus-proved-a-crisis-too-far-for-europes-far-right-outsiders-142415
• Wondreys, J., & Mudde, C. 2020. Victims of the Pandemic? European Far-Right Parties and COVID-19. Nationalities Papers, May 2021, 1–18.
• Ylä-Anttila, T. 2018. Populist knowledge: ‘Post-truth’ repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 5(4), 356–388.