Main topic

POLITICAL NEUTRALITY, STRATEGIC DETERRENCE AND TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

THE CONCEPT OF TOTAL DEFENSE IN THE DETERRENCE STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Abstract

The subject of this article refers to the examination of the convenience of the concept of total defense as a basis for designing a defense system in the function of strategic deterrence of the Republic of Serbia. The existing defense system was supposed to be based on the concept of total defense, which has not been defined, verified and generally accepted since the Republic of Serbia was founded. In accordance with the above, the question arises: whether the existing way of organizing and functioning of the defense system corresponds to the requirements of strategic deterrence. The starting point in this paper is the position that the defense system, without a previously defined and generally accepted concept of total defense, may not be fully efficient and effective in creating a credible and persuasive threat in the function of strategic deterrence. The results of the research indicate that in order to develop the necessary defenece forces capabilities and their use for strategic deterrence, it is necessary to first develop the concept of total defense. Through the development process, it is possible to achieve full agreement of all forces on their tasks, methods of engagement and associated risks. Also, with the concept of total defense, it is possible to determine measures and recommendations on changes in the existing defense system that should increase the effectiveness and efficiency of strategic deterrence. The theoretical-methodological approach used a theoretical analysis and comparison of total defense concepts in different historical and geopolitical conditions, as well as a method concept development that can meet the requirements of strategic deterrence in the conditions of a modern multidimensional strategic environment.

keywords :

References

    • Arreguín-Toft, Ivan. 2005. „How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict.ˮ Cambridge studies in International Security 26 (1): 99-113.
    • Beriša, Hatidža. 2009. „Pripreme društva za odbranu.ˮ Vojno delo 2: 197‒220.
    • Blagojević, Veljko, i Tihomir Radanović. 2022. „Strateško odvraćanje: ključne nadležnosti državnih organa Republike Srbije.ˮ Vojno delo 4: I/28‒39. doi: 10.5937/vojdelo2204028B.
    • Blagojević, Veljko. 2019. „Strateška kultura – studija slučaja – Srbija.ˮ Vojno delo 71 (8): 93‒117. doi:  https://doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo1908093V.
    • Blagojević, Veljko. 2022. Moć i sila – Srbija i vojni faktor u međunarodnoj politici. Beograd: Medija centar Odbrana.
    • Concept Development and Experimentation, Version 2.0, NORDEFCO. 2012. Swedish Armed Forces Joint Concept Development & Experimentation Centre (JCDEC).
    • Fiala, Otto C. 2019. Special Operations Command Europe SOCEUR. https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/U-SMA-Brief-SOCEUR-Resistance-Operating-Concept.pdf.
    • Gearson S., Michael. 2009. „Conventional Deterrence in the Second Nuclear Age.ˮ Parameters 39 3. doi:10.55540/0031-1723.2486.
    • Guide for Navy concept generation and Concept Development Program, Navy Warfare Development Command. 2011. Department of the Navy Office of the Chief of Naval Operations
    • Heffington, Steven, Oler, Adam, and David Tretler. 2019. A National Security Strategy Primer.  Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press.
    •  Hooker, Jr., Richard D. 2019. „How to Defend the Baltic States.ˮ The Jamestown Foundation.  Last access April 20, 2023. https://jamestown.org/wpcontent/ uploads/2019/10/How-to-Defend-the-Baltic-States-full-web4.pdf?x41697
    •             Information & Security: An International Journal 39 (1): 29‒41. doi: 10.11610/isij.3903.
    • Jablonsky, David. 1997. „National Power.ˮ The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters                             27 (1): 34‒54. doi: 10.55540/0031-1723.1815, 2-13.
    • Jakovljević, Vladimir. 2022. „Teorijsko i normativno-pravno određenje civilne odbrane i civilne zaštite.ˮ U Pravni i bezbednosni aspekti upravljanja rizicima od prirodnih i antropogenih katastrofa, ur. Vladimir Cvetković, 61‒79. Beograd: Međunarodni institut za istraživanje katastrofa i Pravni fakultet u Novom Sadu.
    • John F. Schmitt. 2003. Defense Adaptive Red Team (DART) – A Practical Guide for Developing and Writing Military Concepts; Review of Joint Operating Concepts and Joint Functional Concepts, Workshop report.
    • Keković, Zoran, i Vladimir Ninković. 2020. „Towards a conceptualisation of resilience in security studies.ˮ Srpska politička misao 67 (1): 153‒175. doi: doi.org/10.22182/spm.6712020.7.
    • Klein, Robert M., Lundqvist, Stefan, Sumangil, Ed, and Ulrica Pettersson. 2019. „Baltics Left of Bang: The Role of NATO with Partners in Denial-Based Deterrence.ˮ Strategic Forum 301. National Defense University. Last access: April 20, 2023. https://inss.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/stratforum/SF-301.pdf?ver=2019-07-23-142433-990.
    • Larsson, Sebastian. 2021. „Swedish total defence and the emergence of societal security.ˮ In  Nordic Societal Security Convergence and Divergence, eds., Meark Rhinard Sebastian Larsson, Routledge New Security Studies.
    • Mazarr, Michael J. 2018. „Understanding Deterrence.ˮ RAND Corporation. doi: https://doi.org/10.7249/PE295, ttps://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE295.html.
    • Mearsheimer, John. 2018. „Conventional Deterrence: An Interview with. John J. Mearsheimer.” Strategic Studies Quarterly, An Air Force– Sponsored Strategic Forum on National and International Security, 12 (4): 3‒5.
    • Milosavljević, Bogoljub. 2018. „Saveti za nacionalnu bezbednost i odbranu prema uporednim ustavnim rešenjima.ˮ Srpska politička misao 62 (4): 285‒299.  doi: https://doi.org/10.22182/spm.6242018.14.
    • NATO Glossary of terms and definitions. 2021. AAP-06. file:///C:/Users/ljilj/Downloads/AAP-06%202021%20EF.pdf.
    • Navy Pentagon. 2020. https://www.secnav.navy.mil/doni/allinstructions.aspx?Paged=TRUE&p_FileLeafRef=4630%2E26C%2Epdf&p_ID=4226&PageFirstRow=20001&&View=%7BCD83A2AC-33E0-4EF2-B888-8820A1D38AC8%7D.
    • Nikolić, Nebojša. 2018. „Obstacles in Inter-Organizational Cooperation and Hybrid Threats.ˮ
    • Osburg, Jan. 2016. „Unconventional Options for the Defense of the Baltic States: The Swiss Approach.ˮ RAND Corporation. Last access: April 20, 2023. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE179.html.
    • Rekasius, Mindaugas. 2005. „Unconventional deterrence strategy.ˮ Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive. Last access: April 19, 2023. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/36695598.pdf.
    • Singapore Ministry of Defense. “MINDEF Singapore: Total Defence.” Last access: April 27, 2023. /web/portal/mindef/defence-matters/defence-topic/defence-topic-detail/total-defence.
    • Strategija nacionalne bezbednosti Republike Srbije, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbijeˮ, br. 94
    • Strategija odbrane Republike Srbije, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbijeˮ, br. 94.
    • Strategija za borbu protiv pranja novca i finansiranja terorizma Republike Srbije za                         period 2020-2024. Ministarstvo finansija, Uprava za sprečavanje pranja novca. Poslednji pristup 19. april. 2023. http://www.apml.gov.rs/latinica/strategija-za-borbu-protiv-pranja-  novaca-i-                                    finansiranja-terorizma.
    • Strickler, Ted. 2010. „Interagency cooperation: Quo vadis?ˮ Interagency Journal 1 (1): 3‒9. http://thesimonscenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/IAJ-1-1-pg03-09.pdf.
    • Subotić, Milovan, i Vanja Rokvić 2021. „Vraćanje obaveze služenja vojnog roka prilog odlučivanju.ˮ Kultura polisa  18 (45): 247‒262. doi: 10.51738/Kpolisa2021.18.2r.4.01.
    • Strategija ONO i DSZ SFRJ, SSNO, Centar oružanih snaga za strategijska istraživanja             i studije “Maršal Tito”, Beograd, 1987
    • Višnjić, Dušan. 1997. „Izvori otpora novim naučnim saznanjima u polemistici.ˮ Vojno delo 3.
    • Višnjić, Sanja. 2019. „Nacionalna bezbednost i nacionalni identitet.ˮ Nacionalni interes 34 (1): 253‒276. doi: https://doi.org/10.22182/ni.3412019.13.
    • Vračar, Milinko, i Milica Ćurčić. 2022. „Vojna neutralnost Republike Srbije kao strategijska kategorija.ˮ Srpska politička misaoo, posebno izdanje. doi: doi.org/10.22182/spm.specijal2022.2.
    • Vračar, Milinko, i Vangel Milkovski. 2022. „Strategijski pristup Republike Srbije u rešavanju Kosovsko-metohijskog problema.ˮ Nacionalni interes 43 (3): 51‒71. doi: https://doi.org/10.22182/ni.4332022.2
    • Zakon o osnovama uređenja službi bezbednosti, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 116/2007 i 72/2012.
PERIODICS Serbian Political Thought 2/2023 2/2023 УДК 355(497.11) https://doi.org/10.5937/spm80-44249